[SFLphone] Broken download link for version 0.9.6 (source package)?

[Francois Marier]

On 2009-08-03 at 21:05:40, Maurizio Porrato wrote:
> Don't you think splitting source packages for sflphone-common,
> sflphone-client-gnome, sflphone-client-kde would be more convenient?

I don't know much about how Arch packages are put together, but on the
Debian/Ubuntu side of things, it would increase the maintenance burden
significantly if I had to track, update and upload 3 different packages.

Because they are all inter-related (i.e. you need matching versions), it's
quite convenient to have them all in the same source package in my
opinion. Then it gets built into 4 different binary packages (-daemon,
-data, -gnome and -kde).

Cheers,
Francois